The Political Movement
orans.org
We will not vote for any candidate — of any party — who does not publicly support the Billionaire Program Act. That is our commitment. That is our leverage. That is how this becomes law.
THE CORE COMMITMENT
The political movement behind the Billionaire Program Act is organized around a single, unambiguous commitment:
We will not vote for any candidate for federal office — regardless of party — who does not publicly commit to supporting the Billionaire Program Act.
That is it. One issue. One commitment. No exceptions for otherwise admirable candidates. No half-measures. No “I generally support reducing wealth inequality” without a specific commitment to this specific legislation.
This clarity is not stubbornness. It is strategy. The history of political change in America shows, over and over, that focused, unwavering single-issue movements achieve what diffuse, multi-issue coalitions cannot. We intend to be one of those movements.
WHY SINGLE-ISSUE POLITICS?
It Creates Clarity and Accountability
Politicians are expert at triangulation — saying things that sound supportive without committing to anything specific. Single-issue movements eliminate this room. The question is not “do you care about economic inequality?” The question is: “Do you support the Billionaire Program Act — yes or no?” There is no triangulation available. There is no partial credit. The candidate either supports it or they do not.
It Creates Transferable Leverage
A politician who knows that a meaningful bloc of voters in their district will withhold their vote on the basis of a single issue has a clear calculation to make. If the bloc is large enough, supporting the BPA becomes the rational electoral choice — regardless of the politician’s personal views on the issue. This is how politics actually works. Politicians respond to electoral incentives. Our job is to make supporting the BPA the path of least electoral resistance in as many districts as possible.
It Builds Cross-Party Coalitions
The Billionaire Program is not a left-wing issue or a right-wing issue. It is an issue about power — specifically, about whether a small number of individuals should be able to exercise oligarchic power over the economy and the democratic process. There are voters of every political persuasion — conservative, liberal, libertarian, populist — who share a rational interest in limiting that power. A single-issue movement organized around the BPA can build a coalition that crosses party lines in ways that a conventional partisan movement cannot.
HISTORICAL PRECEDENTS FOR SINGLE-ISSUE MOVEMENTS
| Movement | Era | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Abolition | 1830s–1865 | Constitutional amendment abolishing slavery |
| Women’s Suffrage | 1848–1920 | 19th Amendment to the Constitution |
| Labor Movement | 1880s–1938 | Fair Labor Standards Act; 40-hour work week; minimum wage |
| Prohibition | 1870s–1919 | 18th Amendment (later repealed, demonstrating the power of the mechanism) |
| Civil Rights | 1950s–1965 | Civil Rights Act 1964; Voting Rights Act 1965 |
| Anti-Abortion Movement | 1973–present | Dobbs v. Jackson (2022) overturning Roe v. Wade |
The pattern is consistent. Focused, unwavering, single-issue movements — willing to withhold support from otherwise attractive candidates — have reshaped American law and policy on issues that initially seemed politically impossible.
THE COALITION WE ARE BUILDING
Conservative and Libertarian Supporters
Conservatives who believe in competitive markets, limited government, and democratic accountability have strong reasons to oppose oligarchic wealth concentration. When a small number of individuals can capture regulatory agencies, shape legislation through spending, and exercise monopolistic power across multiple industries, those are outcomes that contradict core conservative and libertarian values. The BPA does not expand government — it creates a narrow regulatory mechanism to address a specific market failure.
Progressive and Liberal Supporters
Progressives and liberals who are concerned about economic inequality, democratic accountability, and the power of money in politics will find the BPA’s goals closely aligned with their own. The BPA’s person-to-person redistribution mechanism is more direct and more democratizing than tax-and-transfer approaches — it puts wealth directly into the hands of individuals rather than routing it through government programs.
Populist Supporters — Left and Right
The fastest-growing political constituency in America is the populist center — voters of various backgrounds who are angry about the power of elites over democratic institutions and economic opportunity. The BPA speaks directly to this constituency. It is not a partisan proposal. It is a proposal about power — about whether the rules of the game should allow a small number of individuals to accumulate so much power that the democratic process cannot check them.
Small Business Owners and Entrepreneurs
The BPA includes explicit protections for operating businesses through the One Entity Exemption. Beyond that, small business owners and entrepreneurs have a rational interest in competitive markets — markets that are not distorted by the overwhelming advantages that extreme capital concentration confers on the largest players. The BPA’s long-term market effects include more competitive industries and broader access to startup capital.
HOW THIS BECOMES LAW
Phase 1 — Building Awareness and the Coalition (Years 1-3)
- Grow the movement to a size where the BPA is a recognized political issue that candidates cannot ignore.
- Identify and publicly name candidates who support the BPA, building a growing roster of committed legislators.
- Demonstrate electoral consequences in specific districts where the BPA coalition is large enough to swing close races.
- Engage media, academics, economists, and thought leaders to build the intellectual and public credibility of the proposal.
- Seek international allies — the wealth concentration problem is not unique to the United States, and a coordinated international movement strengthens the case for action.
Phase 2 — Electoral Leverage (Years 3-6)
- In primary elections, support BPA-committed candidates over uncommitted incumbents where possible.
- In general elections, make BPA commitment a public issue — publicizing which candidates have and have not committed.
- Demonstrate that withholding votes has real electoral consequences, creating genuine incentives for candidates to commit.
- Build state-level support for related measures that create political momentum toward federal legislation.
Phase 3 — Legislative Passage (Years 5-10)
- With a sufficient bloc of committed legislators in both chambers, introduce the BPA formally.
- Use the constitutional analysis and impact assessment to build the evidentiary record needed for passage and defense against legal challenge.
- Work with legal scholars, economists, and policy advocates to refine the legislation through the public comment process.
- Sustain the movement through the legislative process, maintaining the electoral threat to uncommitted legislators.
This is a 5-to-10-year project, not a 5-to-10-month one. The history of successful single-issue movements shows that patience, persistence, and willingness to actually withhold votes are the essential ingredients.
WHAT YOU CAN DO TODAY
1. Commit
Make the personal commitment: you will not vote for any candidate for federal office who does not publicly support the BPA. This is the foundational act. Nothing else matters if we do not actually follow through on the commitment when it counts.
2. Share
Share the Billionaire Program with people you know — across party lines, across economic backgrounds. The more people understand what the Program actually proposes, the more support it generates. Dismissal typically comes from ignorance of the details, not from considered disagreement.
3. Engage Your Representatives
Write, call, and visit your Congressional representatives. Ask them directly: do you support the Billionaire Program Act? Document their answers. Share those answers publicly. Create the accountability that makes the electoral threat credible.
4. Build Local Coalitions
Connect with others in your community who share this concern. Political movements are built from the bottom up, through local organizing, local relationships, and local electoral activity. The national movement is the sum of thousands of local commitments.
5. Support the Movement Organizationally
ORANS is an all-volunteer organization. We need people who can contribute time, expertise, and organizational energy to growing the movement. If you have skills in communications, legal analysis, economics, political organizing, or technology, we want to hear from you.
The most important thing you can do is simple: decide that this issue matters enough to affect how you vote, and say so — publicly, persistently, and credibly. That is how single-issue movements change the world.
JOIN US AT ORANS.ORG
ORANS is an all-volunteer organization that exists solely to promote ideas and find solutions to difficult problems.